Floating camps challenge Maine’s regulatory framework

Bob Evans SVP, Industry Relations - realtors.com
Bob Evans SVP, Industry Relations - realtors.com
0Comments

Maine’s waterways are facing challenges due to an influx of “floating camps,” which are proving difficult to regulate and remove. These structures, distinct from houseboats as they lack motors, occupy a legal gray area that complicates enforcement efforts.

Known for their second stories, decks, and other amenities, floating camps often generate rental income for their owners. However, they also pose pollution risks, congest public docks and boat ramps, and obstruct the views of shoreline properties. The Bangor Daily News reported these issues have led to growing concerns among homeowners and authorities.

A floating camp in Hadley Lake in May 2017 (Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife)
The situation has become a bureaucratic mess (Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife)
A floating camp in Camden Harbor in the fall of 2022 (Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife)

Various state agencies have acknowledged the problem for years but struggle with jurisdictional complexities. Floating camps are not entirely onshore; they are often tied to land or anchored to the bottom of water bodies. This makes it challenging to determine which agency has the authority to address them.

Over two years ago, a report by multiple agencies identified “a need to define and regulate these non-water-dependent floating structures in order to protect Maine’s waters.” Despite this recognition, progress has been hindered by “the lack of a clear violation of law or regulation for the unauthorized placement” of these camps.

In Maine, different jurisdictions govern lake bottoms, water quality, and other aspects related to water bodies. This fragmented regulatory landscape means no single group is currently authorized to remove floating camps.

To resolve this issue, the report suggested that an agreement should be reached to ban floating camps. Following this consensus, “a clear prohibition” would be necessary for effective enforcement.



Related

Jon Farney President & Chief Executive Officer

State Farm outlines technology transformation to enhance customer service

State Farm announced new plans on May 8 aimed at improving customer service through advanced technology integration. Executive Vice President Joe Park highlighted a shift toward combining digital tools with human expertise while maintaining longstanding values.

Christopher L. Gandy President-Elect

Dan Scholz named as NAIFA’s 2026 Terry Headley Lifetime Defender Award recipient

Dan Scholz will be honored with NAIFA’s prestigious Terry Headley Lifetime Defender Award this month for his longstanding commitment to advocacy within insurance and financial services circles. The recognition highlights his leadership roles within both local chapters and national committees.

Jon Farney President & Chief Executive Officer

State Farm CEO outlines vision for a ‘Next Gen Good Neighbor’

State Farm CEO Jon Farney has shared plans for transforming the company into a ‘Next Gen Good Neighbor.’ The strategy aims to combine new technology with traditional personal service while maintaining core values.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Insurance Rate Review.